Skip to main content
· 10/28/1999

Comptech Intern., Inc. v. Milam Commerce Park, Ltd.

Citations

  • 753 So. 2d 1219
  • 1999 WL 983857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that computers placed in the warehouse were not an integral part of the product and were therefore \other property\
  • concluding that computers placed in the warehouse were not an integral part of the product and were therefore \other property\
  • holding that the economic loss rule does not apply to a cause of action for injury resulting from the violation of Florida’s Southern Building Code
  • recognizing \the confusion that has abounded in this area of the law\
  • distinguishing between product and other property to allow recovery for damage to other property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.