Bermel v. BlueRadios, Inc
Citations
- 2017 COA 20
- 442 P.3d 923
Syllabus
Breach of Contract—Unjust Enrichment—Colorado Wage Protection Act—Civil Theft—Conversion—Economic Loss Rule—Attorney Fees. Bermel entered into a \Contractor Agreement\ with BlueRadios, Inc. under which he provided engineering services to BlueRadios. He also signed a \Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement\ (PIAA). The parties later ended their relationship. Anticipating that he might end up in litigation over unpaid wages, Bermel breached the PIAA by forwarding to his personal email account thousands of BlueRadios emails and attachments, some of which contained proprietary information. Bermel sent a demand letter to BlueRadios for unpaid wages, which BlueRadios paid. Bermel thereafter filed a lawsuit against BlueRadios asserting claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violation of the Colorado Wage Protection Act (CWPA). BlueRadios filed counterclaims against him, including breach of contract civil theft, under CRS § 18-4-405 and conversion. The court granted summary judgment in favor of BlueRadios on Bermel's CWPA claim, and following trial, found Bermel liable on all of BlueRadios' counterclaims. On appeal, Bermel contended that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for summary judgment, in which he argued that the economic loss rule barred BlueRadios' claim for civil theft. Because the economic loss rule is a judicial construct and a civil theft claim is a statutory cause of action, the economic loss rule does not preclude a cause of action under the civil theft statute. Bermel also argued that the trial court erred in granting BlueRadios' motion for summary judgment on his CWPA claim, contending that the court failed to apply the CWPA's definition of \employee\ when it concluded he was an independent contractor. The evidence attached to BlueRadios' motion for summary judgment did not establish that Bermel was free from control and direction under his contract or that he was customarily engaged in an independent trade, occupation
Cited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2000-09-18· cited 726×
- Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. Softrock Geological Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2014-05-12· cited 340×
- Tiara Condominium Ass'n v. Marsh & McLennan CompaniesSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-03-07· cited 153×
- BRW, Inc. v. Dufficy & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2004-10-04· cited 147×
- Itin v. UngarSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-11-28· cited 95×
- In Re the Marriage of AllenSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-09-02· cited 74×
- Olson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2007-11-29· cited 40×
- Comptech Intern., Inc. v. Milam Commerce Park, Ltd.Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-10-28· cited 38×
- West v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-10-10· cited 27×
- Top Rail Ranch Estates, LLC v. WalkerColorado Court of Appeals· 2014-01-30· cited 27×
- Armed Forces Bank, N.A. v. HicksColorado Court of Appeals· 2014-06-05· cited 23×
- Boehme v. United States Postal ServiceTenth Circuit· 2003-08-27· cited 21×
- MAKOTO USA, INC. v. RussellColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-11-25· cited 17×
- Van Rees v. Unleaded Software, IncSupreme Court of Colorado· 2016-06-27· cited 14×
- People v. WunderColorado Court of Appeals· 2016-03-24· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.