Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 8/23/1988

King v. Hilton-Davis

Citations

  • 855 F.2d 1047
  • 1988 WL 86506

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In determining whether a product ‘injures only itself’ for purposes of applying the East River rule . . . [one must] look to the product purchased by the plaintiff”
  • character of plaintiffs loss may determine the nature of available remedies thus when loss is solely the benefit of the bargain, a contract remedy is sufficient
  • character of plaintiff's loss may determine the nature of available remedies thus when loss is solely the benefit of the bargain, a contract remedy is sufficient
  • cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 (Jan. 17, 1989)
  • cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 (Jan. 17, 1989)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenberg, Higginbotham, Stapleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named King v. Hilton-Davis

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.