Skip to main content
· 4/28/2006

Walters v. Blankenship

Citations

  • 931 So. 2d 137
  • 2006 WL 1144385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the exception to the independent tort requirement and reversing dismissal of civil conspiracy count
  • former home owners state a claim for civil conspiracy where the cooperative nature of the defendants’ action allegedly caused the resulting losses
  • “Generally an actionable conspiracy requires an actionable underlying tort or wrong.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.