Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/18/2015

Commonwealth v. Wilson

Citations

111 A.3d 747
2015 Pa. Super. 36
2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 56

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that where a trooper testified that he witnessed the defendant “swerve[] multiple times across the yellow lines and fog line” the trooper had probable cause to stop the defendant for a violation of, among other things, section 3714
finding that the officer possessed probable cause to believe that Wilson had violated the Motor Vehicle Code provisions of, inter alia , careless driving, when the officer observed Wilson, inter alia , swerve over the yellow lines and fog line multiple times
holding officer had probable cause to stop vehicle for careless driving where he “observed it completely stopped in the middle of the road, and then, when the officer approached, the vehicle began to move but swerved multiple times across the yellow lines and fog line”
distinguishing the limiting language of Section 3803(a) and the holding in Musau from the language in Section 3803(b)(1), which, although it provides for a maximum six-month sentence -9- J-S18040-15 for violation of Section 3802(b
referring to a violation of § 1332(b)(3) as a “non-investigable” offense
articulating why paragraph (b)(5) takes precedence over paragraph (b)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Bowes, Allen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.