Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 10/6/2015
Commonwealth v. Williams
Citations
- 125 A.3d 425
- 2015 Pa. Super. 216
- 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 581
- 2015 WL 5810631
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that issue of conflict of law is a pure question of law
- concluding that officer had reasonable suspicion to support a traffic stop after observing appellant driving with the trunk of his car “bouncing up and down,” based on Department of Transportation regulations and Section 4107(b)(2) of the Motor Vehicle Code
- stating that an appellate court “may affirm [a trial court’s decision] on any legal basis supported by the certified record” (citation omitted)
- affirming denial of suppression based upon police officer’s reasonable suspicion of a violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 4107(b)(2)
- considering inspection procedures under the Department of Transportation’s regulations to determine that police officer had reasonable suspicion that a violation of the Motor Vehicle Code was occurring
- repeating the general rule that, “although the local courts have broad authority to promulgate local rules of procedure, local rules shall not be inconsistent with any general rule of the Supreme Court or any Act of Assembly.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Panella, Mundy, Jenkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. GraysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-25· cited 170×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-07-20· cited 95×
- Dixon, J. v. Northwestern MutualSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-08-25· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. SauersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-03-29· cited 48×
- Com. v. Ani, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-04-17· cited 31×
- Horwath, S. v. DiGrazio, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-06-24· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. LibengoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-12-16· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. LancitSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-05-18· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. ParsonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-14· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. TorresSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-12-08· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. RichardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-11-20· cited 5×
- In Re: Order Amending Rules 1005, 1006, and 1007 of the PA Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-11-09
- Com. v. Golding, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-02-20
- In Re: $300,000 in U.S. Currency -- Appeal of: Z. XuCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-07-16
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- Prado Navarette v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2014-04-22· cited 1,110×
- Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-03-11· cited 418×
- Commonwealth v. GarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-29· cited 255×
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-04-20· cited 154×
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-08-19· cited 152×
- Commonwealth v. ClemensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-15· cited 132×
- Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-02· cited 98×
- Commonwealth v. LandisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-08· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. MenezesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-08· cited 63×
- COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-02-12· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-02-18· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. RosarioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-10-06· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. BeaufortSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-03-24· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. ReyesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. KellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-05-25· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.