Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 11/2/2005

Commonwealth v. Sands

Citations

887 A.2d 261
2005 Pa. Super. 372
2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that \a suspected violation for DUI is in fact a scenario where further investigation almost invariably leads to the most incriminating type of evidence.\
stating that “a suspected violation for DUI is in fact a scenario where further investigation almost invariably leads to the most incriminating type of evidence.”
stating that “a suspected violation for DUI is in fact a scenario where further investigation almost invariably leads to the most incriminating type of evidence”
noting that officers observed “unsteady, weaving progress” by the defendant, who crossed the fog line by three feet and appeared “unable to stay in its lane”
reiterating that “the officer must be able to relay specific and articulable facts that would give rise to a reasonable suspicion that the person is driving under the influence”
stating that police officer had reasonable suspicion to perform traffic stop to investigate suspected DUI where vehicle spotted weaving early in the morning and crossing the fog line three times

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Musmanno, Olszewski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.