Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 7/20/2015
Commonwealth v. Blystone
Citations
- 119 A.3d 306
- 632 Pa. 260
- 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1533
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that issues of jurisdiction may be raised sua sponte
- finding that issues of jurisdiction may be raised sua sponte
- court treated order compelling discovery as to issues relating to attorney-client privilege as collateral, but refused to treat order as to other issues as collateral
- “With respect to the first prong of - 13 - J-A26042-24 the collateral order doctrine, an order is separable from the main cause of action if it can be resolved without an analysis of the merits of the underlying dispute.”
- appellate court may raise issue of jurisdiction sua sponte
- appellate court may raise issue of jurisdiction sua sponte
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baer, Eakin, Saylor, Stevens, Todd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shearer, D., Aplts. v. Hafer, S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-01-18· cited 84×
- K.C. and V.C. v. L.A. Appeal of: D.M and L.N.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-12-21· cited 73×
- In the Int. of: J.M., Appeal of: L.M.-M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-09-13· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-24· cited 39×
- Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Found. v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-01-23· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-11-30· cited 16×
- Orozco, J. v. Tecu, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-10-13· cited 10×
- Com. v. Alston, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-05-26· cited 9×
- Com. v. Chism, Z.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-08-09· cited 4×
- Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation, a Pennsylvania Non-Profit Corporation v. A.P. Ziegler, Jr. M.S. Bibro and J.R. NorrisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-04-21· cited 3×
- Pgh History v. Ziegler, Appeal of: HoffstotSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-01-23
- Com. v. Gross, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-04-29
- Colonial School District v. Montgomery County Bd. of Assessment Appeals ~ Appeal of: Metroplex West Assoc., L.P.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-05-28
- Propel Charter Schools v. PA Dept. of Education and State Charter School Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-11-20
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Pownall, R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-07-20
- Downs Racing, L.P. v. Luzerne CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-06-02
- A.M.D. v. A.L.R, Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-10-18
- South Hills Catholic Academy v. DHSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-01-11
- Brooks v. Cole; Apl of: Family CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-09-22
- Duncan v. Chartiers Nature Conservancy, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-12-15
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court· 1995-06-12· cited 2,857×
- Blystone v. HornThird Circuit· 2011-12-22· cited 380×
- Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-21· cited 216×
- Commonwealth v. BlystoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-17· cited 180×
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-11-23· cited 112×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-19· cited 83×
- Commonwealth v. FenstermakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-25· cited 82×
- Pridgen v. Parker Hannifin Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-22· cited 79×
- Commonwealth v. BlystoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-02-26· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. ShearerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-09-15· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-10-30· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.