Skip to main content
· 12/21/2015

K.C. and V.C. v. L.A. Appeal of: D.M and L.N.

Citations

  • 128 A.3d 774
  • 633 Pa. 722
  • 2015 Pa. LEXIS 3022
  • 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an order granting foster parents' permission to intervene in dependency case is an appealable collateral order
  • holding that an order denying intervention in a child custody case due to a lack of standing meets all three prongs of the collateral order doctrine
  • holding that an appeal from an order denying intervention in a custody action is a collateral order
  • holding that an order denying intervention in a child custody case due to a lack of standing meets all three prongs of the collateral order doctrine
  • holding order denying petition to intervene in custody action is appealable as collateral order
  • stating that \an order is separable from the main cause of action if it is entirely distinct from the underlying issue in the case and if it can be resolved without an analysis of the merits of the underlying dispute.\ (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.