Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/25/2011

In re Jacobs

Citations

15 A.3d 509
2011 Pa. Super. 39
2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 49

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that trial court had no jurisdiction under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6111.1(g) to consider a petition to expunge records of an individual’s involuntary commitment under Section 303 filed five years after commitment order was entered
concluding that the appellant’s Section 302 issues are moot because, “even if [the appellant was] entitled to expunction under [Section] []302, expunction cannot go forward because [the] appellant was also involuntarily committed under [Section] []303”
holding that this Court may affirm an order on any basis
holding, inter alia, that subsection 6111.1(g) “only imbues the lower court with jurisdiction to review commitments under [section 302]”
stating Superior Court is not bound by rationale of trial court and may affirm on any basis
explaining Superior Court is not bound by rationale of trial court and may affirm on any basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colville, Elliott, Mundy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In re Jacobs

68 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.