Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/18/2005

Commonwealth v. Williams

Citations

871 A.2d 254
2005 Pa. Super. 105
2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that, where this Court disturbs the court’s overall sentencing scheme, it is appropriate to remand for resentencing
noting that where this Court disturbs the court’s overall sentencing scheme it is appropriate to remand for resentencing
holding that evidence was sufficient to prove actual physical control of vehicle where defendant was found in his car at 4 a.m., with his head on steering wheel, headlights on, radio on, engine running, and vehicle parked diagonally across two parking spots
finding that appellant had actual physical control of vehicle where police discovered vehicle parked diagonally and appellant was asleep in the driver’s seat with the engine running, and failed sobriety tests
requiring remand for trial court to restructure its sentence in cases where appellate disposition upsets trial court’s overall sentencing scheme
vacating appellant’s judgment of -8- J-A18017-20 sentence for second conviction under separate subsection of DUI statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Gantman, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.