Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/25/2004
Commonwealth v. Benner
Citations
- 853 A.2d 1068
- 2004 Pa. Super. 243
- 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1474
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that \existence of some punitive element is a prerequisite to any determination that a law is ex post facto \ and registration, notification, and counseling requirements are not punitive
- indicating that “existence of some punitive element is a prerequisite to any determination that a law is ex post facto ” and registration, notification, and counseling requirements are not punitive
- finding Megan’s Law II’s registration requirement a collateral consequence of the appellant’s plea agreement
- Benner was always subject to a reporting requirement, albeit ten years instead of a lifetime, and the record did not support -registration as a term of his plea
- although Megan’s Law I was in effect on the dates of defendant’s guilty plea and sentencing, defendant was subject to the lifetime registration requirement of Megan’s Law II
- Benner was always subject to a reporting requirement, albeit ten years instead of a lifetime, and the record did not support Benner’s contention that he had bargained for non-registration as a term of his plea
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens, Tamilia, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. NeimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-16· cited 231×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-18· cited 155×
- Commonwealth v. P.L.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-02-02· cited 124×
- Commonwealth v. HainesworthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-12· cited 122×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-07-02· cited 105×
- Commonwealth v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-05-27· cited 94×
- Commonwealth v. ParteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-20· cited 77×
- Commonwealth v. FuentesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-03-17· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. McDonoughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-07-21· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. NaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-09-09· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. BundySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-07-10· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. HitnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-10-27· cited 20×
- Gordon v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-30· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. DemmittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-01· cited 6×
- Com. v. PLSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-02-02
- Com. v. Giannantonio, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-04-20
- Commonwealth v. WoodruffLackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 2015-03-06
- Commonwealth v. PasdonDelaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2007-11-29
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-25· cited 383×
- Commonwealth v. HodgesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-01-03· cited 122×
- Commonwealth v. PersingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-10· cited 110×
- Commonwealth v. GaffneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-30· cited 98×
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-05· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-06-17· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. LeidigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-05-14· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-31· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.