Commonwealth v. Mobley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s failure of field sobriety tests was provided sufficient evidence for his conviction under § 3802(a)
• holding that the impaired ability to drive safely was proven where the defendant failed field sobriety tests, smelled of alcohol, and ran a stop sign with a police officer in plain view
• holding that evidence that defendant failed field sobriety tests, smelled of alcohol, and had committed a traffic violation of coasting through a stop sign without coming to a full stop was sufficient support to DUI conviction
• holding that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the appellant’s conviction of DUI where the appellant (a) violated the Code by coasting through a stop sign; (b) smelled of alcohol; and (c) failed four separate FSTs
• stating that “[t]he Commonwealth may prove that a person is incapable of safe driving through the failure of a field sobriety test.”
• noting that “[t]he Commonwealth may prove that a person is incapable of safe driving through the failure of a field sobriety test.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).