Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Williams

Citations

  • 909 A.2d 383
  • 2006 Pa. Super. 279
  • 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3066
  • 2006 WL 2807531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that DNA testing would not establish appellant’s innocence, where his identity was not at issue in rape trial, as his defense theory was that the sexual intercourse had been consensual
  • holding issues not raised in PCRA petition are waived on appeal
  • holding issues not raised in PCRA petition are waived on appeal
  • stating court’s failure to provide Rule 907 notice is not reversible error or even ground for remand, where petitioner has failed to raise issue on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Musmanno, Panella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.