Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Walsh

Citations

  • 125 A.3d 1248
  • 2015 Pa. Super. 222
  • 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 700
  • 2015 WL 6438925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim of trial counsel ineffectiveness regarding DNA testing is not cognizable in a motion for DNA testing
  • holding that relief was unavailable on a DNA testing motion because it was untimely
  • concluding that defendant “failed to satisfy the threshold requirements to obtain DNA testing pursuant to [§] 9543.1(a)(2); he did not present a prima facie case of actual innocence pursuant to [§] 9543.1(c)(3
  • concluding that defendant “failed to satisfy the threshold requirements to obtain DNA testing pursuant to [§] 9543.1(a)(2); he did not present a prima facie case of actual innocence pursuant to [§] 9543.1(c)(3
  • stating that the applicant must satisfy “threshold requirements [of Section 9543.1(a)] necessary to obtain post-conviction DNA testing”
  • noting that issues raised outside the request for DNA evidence “are unreviewable at this juncture”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, Panella, Olson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.