Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. White

Citations

  • 910 A.2d 648
  • 589 Pa. 642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, even in those instances where a jurist can impartially consider a case, the judge must also consider whether his or her continued involvement \creates an appearance of impropriety and/or would tend to undermine public confidence in the judiciary\
  • explaining that, even in those instances where a jurist can impartially consider a case, the judge must also consider whether his or her continued involvement “creates an appearance of impropriety and/or would tend to undermine public confidence in the judiciary”
  • explaining that, even in those instances where a jurist can impartially consider a case, the judge must also consider whether his or her continued involvement “creates an appearance of impropriety and/or would tend to undermine public confidence in the judiciary”
  • clarifying the holding in Cosnak, and applying Rule 311(d) to certain non-evidentiary rulings -5- J-S20011-17 J-S20012-17 terminating or substantially handicapping the Commonwealth’s case
  • reflecting the judge's statement: \[T]he arrogance of you to come in here and presume that I would somehow not honor my obligations as a jurist is patently offensive.\
  • reflecting the judge’s statement: “[T]he arrogance of you to come in here and presume that I would somehow not honor my obligations as a jurist is patently offensive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.