Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/21/2015

Lomas, R. v. Kravitz, J.

Citations

  • 130 A.3d 107
  • 2015 Pa. Super. 267
  • 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 832
  • 2015 WL 9304279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that prevailing party was not entitled to attorney’s fees and costs for failing to include claim in original pleading
  • affirming order allowing piercing of the corporate veil because the fact-finder made credibility determinations which could not be overturned due to evidence in the record supporting them
  • “a fact-finder’s credibility determinations may not be overturned by a reviewing court as long as there is sufficient evidence in the record to support those determinations”
  • “If the judge determines he or she can be impartial, the judge must then decide whether his or her continued involvement in the case creates an appearance of impropriety and/or would tend to undermine public confidence in the judiciary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Bowes, Panella, Donohue, Shogan, Allen, Lazarus, Wecht, Stabile, Shoganjoin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Lomas, R. v. Kravitz, J.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.