Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Wharton

Citations

  • 594 A.2d 696
  • 406 Pa. Super. 430
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2020

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on Commonwealth v. Yachymiak, 505 A.2d 1024 (Pa. Super. 1986)
  • charges were consolidated in single trial where jury was factfinder in the felony and misdemeanor charges and trial court was factfinder in summary charges; court was “not required to defer to the findings of the jury on common factual issues”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Montemuro, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.