Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/11/1993
Commonwealth v. Smith
Citations
- 626 A.2d 178
- 426 Pa. Super. 31
- 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1923
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court applied two pronged double jeopardy analysis enunciated in Grady
- court applied two pronged double jeopardy analysis enunciated in Grady
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tamilia, Popovich, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 1,620×
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-15· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-30· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. WhartonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-25· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. KemmererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-01-04· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. HicksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-12-14· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. YinglingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-08· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.