Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. States

Citations

  • 891 A.2d 737
  • 2005 Pa. Super. 434
  • 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that acquittal in defendant’s previous trial was binding in subsequent proceeding where the charges against defendant had been severed
  • recognizing this exception and describing how “[t]he basic purpose of the double jeopardy clause mandates that a defendant who has a meritorious claim have an effective procedural means of vindicating his constitutional right to be spared an unnecessary trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melvin, McCaffery, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.