Pennsylvania v. Campana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating state court judgments in which plurality had held that Fifth Amendment required “same transaction rule,” and remanding for consideration of whether judgments were based on state or federal constitutions, or both

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Pennsylvania v. Campana

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Pennsylvania v. Campana
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 9×