Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/11/2000
Commonwealth v. Weimer
Citations
- 756 A.2d 684
- 2000 Pa. Super. 199
- 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1581
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- treating appellant’s motions, including motion to reinstate appeal rights, as a PCRA petition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hudock, Eakin, Beck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. EllerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-09-25· cited 130×
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-24· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. BallardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-01-06· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. CappelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-30· cited 8×
- Satterfield v. JohnsonE.D. Pennsylvania· 2002-09-06· cited 2×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-27· cited 1,072×
- Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-07· cited 472×
- Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-21· cited 447×
- Commonwealth v. YarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-05-21· cited 284×
- Commonwealth v. HockenberrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-01-31· cited 75×
- Commonwealth v. PriovolosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-27· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. HitchcockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-23· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. GarciaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-23· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. DiVenturaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-05-25· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.