Commonwealth v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, where a new sentence is imposed at a probation revocation hearing, the PCRA’s purpose requires employment of the revocation hearing date
• stating that “[p]robation revocation does not materially alter the underlying conviction such that the period available for collateral review must be restarted.”
• holding time for seeking PCRA relief after revocation of probation and imposition of new sentence runs from one year of conclusion of direct review of new sentence, for issues concerning new sentence
• “[p]robation revocation does not materially alter the underlying conviction such that the period available for collateral review must be restarted”
• “[W]here a new sentence is imposed at a probation revocation hearing, the revocation hearing date must be employed when assessing finality under § 9545(b)(3) to any issues directly appealable from that hearing.”
• “We hold that where a new sentence is imposed at a probation revocation hearing, the revocation hearing date must be employed when assessing finality under § 9545(b)(3) to any issues directly appealable from that hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Cartrette
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-24· cited 1,101×
• Commonwealth v. Fowler
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-07-23· cited 444×
• Commonwealth v. Garcia
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-06-17· cited 231×
• Commonwealth v. Ballard
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-01-06· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Cappello
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-30· cited 8×
• Pennington v. Tice
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-03-18· cited 2×
• Com. v. Williams, R.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-07-24
• Com. v. Cruz, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-03-12

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Beasley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-12-09· cited 214×
• Commonwealth v. Gilmore
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-30· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Gheen
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-02-11· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Weimer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-07-11· cited 12×