Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Wallace

Citations

  • 500 A.2d 816
  • 347 Pa. Super. 248
  • 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 8093

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • failing to present allegedly exculpatory evidence that was unknown to the attorney does not rise to the level of ineffectiveness
  • rejecting PCRA petitioner’s ineffectiveness claim when the petitioner had informed the trial court that he was satisfied with trial - 15 - J-S04025-15 counsel’s advice not to take the stand
  • “trial counsel cannot be found ineffective for failing to present alleged exculpatory testimony of which he was unaware”
  • “It is also established that trial counsel’s failure to conduct a more thorough investigation or to interview all potential witnesses does not constitute per se ineffectiveness.”
  • trial counsel not ineffective where notes of testimony indicate that discussion took place during trial in which defendant told court that he was satisfied with his lawyer’s advice not to take witness stand
  • trial counsel not ineffective where notes of testimony indicated that discussion took place during trial in which the defendant told the court that he was satisfied with his lawyer’s advice not to take witness stand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Cirillo, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.