Skip to main content
· 2/11/1988

Commonwealth v. Delligatti

Citations

  • 538 A.2d 34
  • 371 Pa. Super. 315
  • 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no entrapment as a matter of law where undercover police officer approached defendant and asked him to obtain heroin, and defendant readily accepted officer’s proposition without further insistence
  • appellant fails to state how court's refusal to conduct individual voir dire prejudiced him
  • undercover officer’s permitting defendant to retain a portion of heroin defendant obtained for officer as a fee did not violate due process as such conduct is normal in drug transactions and was necessary to avoid jeopardizing ongoing investigation
  • appellant fails dire prejudiced him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosky, Sole, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.