· 2/11/1988
Commonwealth v. Delligatti
Citations
- 538 A.2d 34
- 371 Pa. Super. 315
- 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 526
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no entrapment as a matter of law where undercover police officer approached defendant and asked him to obtain heroin, and defendant readily accepted officer’s proposition without further insistence
- appellant fails to state how court's refusal to conduct individual voir dire prejudiced him
- undercover officer’s permitting defendant to retain a portion of heroin defendant obtained for officer as a fee did not violate due process as such conduct is normal in drug transactions and was necessary to avoid jeopardizing ongoing investigation
- appellant fails dire prejudiced him
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brosky, Sole, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.