Commonwealth v. Lilliock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jury was properly allowed to use magnifying glass not admitted into evidence to examine photographic evidence because use of the magnifying lens was merely to view the evidence presented during trial
• holding same for alibi witnesses
• use of magnifying glass to scrutinize photos already addressed by expert witnesses merely assisted jury in their truth- finding process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).