Commonwealth v. Firman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that application of Mundorf s approach would “unduly constrain the authority conferred by the legislature upon [Port Authority] officers in this Commonwealth”
• indicating that application of Mundorf's approach would \unduly constrain the authority conferred by the legislature upon [Port Authority] officers in this Commonwealth\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance v. Pro Design, P.C.
  Third Circuit· 2009-05-12· cited 113×
• Commonwealth v. Quaid
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-17· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Firman
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-31· cited 13×
• State Auto Prop Cslt v. Pro Design
  Third Circuit· 2009-05-12

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Dugger
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-09· cited 417×
• Commonwealth v. Nester
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-25· cited 199×
• Commonwealth v. Valentin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-03· cited 36×
• McKinley v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-04-19· cited 23×
• McKinley v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-04-19· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Carlson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-01-13· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Schatzel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-04· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Mundorf
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-08-26· cited 7×