Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Toro

Citations

  • 638 A.2d 991
  • 432 Pa. Super. 383
  • 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that conflict of interest may arise if counsel reveals privileged communications of former client
  • stating that evidence that the defendant “use[d] different names during his contacts with police … was relevant to the issue of [his] consciousness of guilt”
  • stating, “prosecutor [properly] elicited information regarding appellant’s use of different names during his contacts with the police … [because e]vidence of this type was relevant to the issue of appellant’s consciousness of guilt[]”
  • “Appellant and Mr. Cartagena were thereafter charged [with several drug offenses] ... and Appellant was convicted of those offenses.”
  • \Appellant and Mr. Cartagena were thereafter charged [with several drug offenses] . . . and Appellant was convicted of those offenses.\
  • mere references in testimony to defendant’s contacts with police not prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Elliott, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.