Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Thompson

Citations

  • 93 A.3d 478
  • 2014 Pa. Super. 106
  • 2014 WL 2131965
  • 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that raising a weight of the evidence claim for the first time in a 1925(b) concise statement does not preserve the claim for appeal
  • Holding that appellant waived weight of the evidence claim by failing to file post- sentence motion.
  • holding that the failure to properly preserve a claim will result in waiver, even if the trial court addresses the issue in its Rule Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion
  • holding that the failure to raise a weight-of-the- evidence claim orally and on the record at the time of sentencing or in a post- sentence motion, results in waiver, even if trial court addresses the issue in its opinion
  • noting that if an appellant never gives the trial court the opportunity to provide relief, then there is no discretionary act that this Court can review
  • explaining that trial court never “ruled” on the issue when it addressed weight claim in its opinion; at that time, court was divested of jurisdiction and could not take further action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Lazarus, Panella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.