Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Tejada

Citations

  • 161 A.3d 313
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 123
  • 2017 WL 1494097
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding court may sentence without PSI if it has necessary information from other source, based on record
  • finding that following the appellant's objection to the lack of a PSI report, the sentencing court erred in imposing sentence as the record failed to reveal the extent of the court's knowledge
  • vacating the sentence and remanding for resentencing where, “[f]ollowing Appellant's objection to the lack of a PSI report, the court immediately imposed sentence with no further discussion or input from the parties”
  • claim that trial court sentenced defendant without the benefit of a PSI report implicates the discretionary aspects of sentencing and is not automatically reviewable as of right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Olson, Stabile

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.