Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Tejada

Citations

  • 176 A.3d 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that trial of a pro se defendant in absentia “involve[s] complex constitutional issues”
  • denying counsel’s petition to withdraw and directing her to file an advocate’s brief, where her Anders brief included an issue that was not frivolous
  • remanding for filing of advocate’s brief upon concluding that issue raised by counsel was not frivolous
  • remanding for filing of advocate’s brief upon concluding that issue raised by counsel was not frivolous
  • finding that panel did not have to independently examine the record for additional issues of merit where counsel was directed to file merits brief due to a finding that one of the issues set forth in the Anders brief was not frivolous
  • finding that the panel did not have to independently examine the record for additional issues of merit where counsel was directed to file merits brief due to a finding that one of the issues set forth in the Anders brief was not frivolous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Solano, Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.