Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/12/2017
Commonwealth v. Tejada
Citations
- 176 A.3d 355
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that trial of a pro se defendant in absentia “involve[s] complex constitutional issues”
- denying counsel’s petition to withdraw and directing her to file an advocate’s brief, where her Anders brief included an issue that was not frivolous
- remanding for filing of advocate’s brief upon concluding that issue raised by counsel was not frivolous
- remanding for filing of advocate’s brief upon concluding that issue raised by counsel was not frivolous
- finding that panel did not have to independently examine the record for additional issues of merit where counsel was directed to file merits brief due to a finding that one of the issues set forth in the Anders brief was not frivolous
- finding that the panel did not have to independently examine the record for additional issues of merit where counsel was directed to file merits brief due to a finding that one of the issues set forth in the Anders brief was not frivolous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowes, Solano, Elliott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-08-25· cited 1,639×
- Commonwealth v. CartretteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-24· cited 1,101×
- Commonwealth v. DanielsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-06-18· cited 396×
- Commonwealth v. CherrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-07· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. TejadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-04-26· cited 66×
- United States v. Leroy Roosevelt MackNinth Circuit· 2004-03-30· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. BlauserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-06-28· cited 37×
- State v. MenefeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-31· cited 10×
- State v. LaceyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.