Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/20/2019

Commonwealth v. Mikitiuk

Citations

213 A.3d 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing that Section 3302(a)’s list of dangerous means is “open-ended and not exhaustive”
stating that “[a] successful sufficiency-of- the-evidence claim requires discharge” (citation omitted)
finding evidence sufficient to support risking catastrophe conviction based on defendant’s possession of flammable and explosive chemicals used in methamphetamine manufacture, in the bed of a pickup truck, which was parked an urban area near multiple buildings
“[a]ppellant requests that we re-weigh the evidence and assess the credibility of a witness presented at trial, a task that is beyond our scope of review.”
“Whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the charge presents a question of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, Murray, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.