Commonwealth v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no other legitimate reason for contemnor’s text message could be discerned, other than to harass or annoy former wife
• “The Commonwealth may sustain its burden by means of wholly circumstantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Rayner
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-12-29· cited 67×
• Com. v. Faison, W.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-06-20· cited 59×
• Commonwealth v. Reese
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-02-27· cited 34×
• Com. v. Bartic, T.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-09-12· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Felder
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-12-11· cited 32×
• Shaner, W. v. Harriman, C.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-07· cited 9×
• Calisto, M. v. Rodgers, M.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-02-25· cited 7×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Griffin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-02· cited 889×
• Commonwealth v. Woodard, A., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-12-03· cited 216×
• Commonwealth v. Kiesel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-06-29· cited 182×
• Commonwealth v. Walsh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-01-18· cited 112×
• Commonwealth v. Haigh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-04-18· cited 58×
• Commonwealth v. Jackson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-08· cited 51×
• Commonwealth v. Baker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-23· cited 42×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-12-11· cited 35×