Commonwealth v. Felder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that “the trier of fact, while passing upon the credibility of witnesses and the weight of the evidence produced, is free to believe all, part or none of the evidence”
• reiterating that “the trier of fact[,] while passing upon the credibility of witnesses and the weight of the evidence produced, is free to believe all, part or none of the evidence” (citation omitted)
• stating that “the purpose of the PFA Act is to protect victims of domestic violence from those who perpetrate such abuse, with the primary goal of advance prevention of physical and sexual abuse” (brackets, original quotation marks and citation omitted)
• Commonwealth proves indirect criminal contempt where PFA order was “sufficiently definite, clear, and specific” as to prohibited conduct; the contemnor had notice; the violation was volitional; and contemnor acted with wrongful intent.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Shaner, W. v. Harriman, C.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-07· cited 9×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Brumbaugh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-07-31· cited 119×
• Commonwealth v. Walsh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-01-18· cited 112×
• Commonwealth v. Haigh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-04-18· cited 58×
• Commonwealth v. Jackson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-08· cited 51×
• Commonwealth v. Lambert
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-09-07· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Taylor
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-04-11· cited 39×