Calisto, M. v. Rodgers, M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To constitute reversible error, an evidentiary ruling must not only be erroneous, but also harmful or prejudicial to the complaining party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Monroe, A. v. CBH20, LP
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-11-21· cited 19×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. Borah
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-21· cited 354×
• Commonwealth v. Trippett
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-08-24· cited 168×
• Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-16· cited 155×
• Czimmer v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-08-20· cited 56×
• Commonwealth v. Taylor
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-04-11· cited 39×
• Empire Properties, Inc. v. Equireal, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-04· cited 37×
• Zuk v. Zuk
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-09-05· cited 35×
• Conroy v. Rosenwald
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-28· cited 32×
• Nebesho v. Brown
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-03-26· cited 18×
• Scott v. Penn Title Insurance
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 1956-06-28· cited 2×