Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Brown

Citations

  • 839 A.2d 433
  • 2003 Pa. Super. 486
  • 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an internet site such as MapQuestTM, which purports to establish distances between two locations, is not so reliable that its “accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.”
  • holding a judicially noticed fact is one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned
  • finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s refusal to take judicial notice of the distance between two points as stated on the mapquest - 14 - J-S65023-15 website
  • “An internet site determining distances does not have the same inherent accuracy as do professionally accepted medical dictionaries, or encyclopedias, or other matters of common knowledge within the community.”
  • criminal proceeding in which judicial notice of MapQuest was taken in order to determine whether to invoke a mandatory sentencing provision of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa. C.S. §§ 101-9546

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melvin, Lally-Green, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.