Commonwealth v. Eisenberg, M., Aplt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the proper entry of a guilty plea acts to extinguish virtually all legal challenges that could have been brought upon the trial or appeal of the case
• concluding that the defendant “adequately preserved his []claim for [Pa.R.A.P.] 302 purposes at the plea hearing”
• concluding that the defendant “adequately preserved [] his claim for Rule 302 purposes at the plea hearing”
• holding that the proper entry of a guilty plea acts to extinguish virtually all legal challenges that could have been brought upon the trial or appeal of the case
• holding that the proper entry of a guilty plea acts to extinguish virtually all legal challenges that could have been brought upon the trial or appeal of the case
• holding that the proper entry of a guilty plea acts to extinguish virtually all legal challenges that could have been brought upon the trial or appeal of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).