Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Small

Citations

  • 980 A.2d 549
  • 602 Pa. 425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a broad and vague claim of the prejudicial effect of cumulative errors did not entitle the appellant to relief
  • concluding that a broad and vague claim of the prejudicial effect of cumulative errors did not entitle the appellant to relief
  • concluding that a broad and vague claim of the prejudicial effect of cumulative errors did not entitle the appellant to relief
  • holding that the failure to impeach a witness on a particular ground cannot constitute ineffective assistance of counsel if trial counsel had a reasonable strategy for not so impeaching
  • concluding that a broad and vague claim of the prejudicial effect of cumulative errors did not entitle the appellant to relief
  • concluding that a broad and vague claim of the prejudicial effect of cumulative errors did not entitle the appellant to relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, Greenspan, McCAFFERY, Saylor, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.