Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/17/1987
Commonwealth v. Sims
Citations
- 521 A.2d 391
- 513 Pa. 366
- 1987 Pa. LEXIS 621
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Notwithstanding our view of the soundness of Greene, it is controlling and the issue is resolved against the defendant
- Notwithstanding our view of the soundness of Greene, it is controlling and the issue is resolved against the defendant
- right of confrontation is qualified to extent of existing testimonial privileges, including attorney-client privilege which protect against compelled disclosure of confidential communications made by client to attorney
- right of confrontation is qualified to extent of existing testimonial privileges, including attorney-client privilege which protect against compelled disclosure of confidential communications made by client to attorney
- sixth amendment right of confrontation did not abrogate attorney-client privilege
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Papadakos, Hutchinson, Zappala
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. AliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-29· cited 675×
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 214×
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-19· cited 124×
- Commonwealth v. KyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-20· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-11-18· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. KennedySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-23· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. LloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-10-19· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. YaborSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-06-29· cited 19×
- Com. v. Segarra, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-02-10· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-10-26· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. CorleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-01-27· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. AaronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-30· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. BartlettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-30· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. BartlettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-21· cited 1×
- United States Ex Rel. Patosky v. KozakiewiczW.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-03-24
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 763×
- Daniel J. Bowles v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1970-11-20· cited 175×
- Fontaine v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 91×
- Slater v. Rimar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-04-17· cited 91×
- Commonwealth v. WhackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 89×
- Robert J. Fletcher v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1964-04-30· cited 72×
- Commonwealth v. GreeneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-20· cited 67×
- Jack W. McRae v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-11-18· cited 66×
- Estate of KofskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-21· cited 59×
- Commonwealth v. DuvalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-07-02· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. MaguiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-06-30· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-30· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-01· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.