Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Carson

Citations

  • 741 A.2d 686
  • 559 Pa. 460
  • 1999 Pa. LEXIS 3438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, however, that such an affirmative duty may require an extensive record developed at voir dire to facilitate appellate review
  • noting trial counsel’s actions are unreasonable when they repeatedly violate court orders
  • “It is well settled that the decision to testify on one’s behalf is ultimately to be made by the defendant after full consultation with counsel.”
  • \It is well settled that the decision to testify on one's behalf is ultimately to be made by the defendant after full consultation with counsel.\
  • \It is well settled that the decision to testify on one's behalf is ultimately to be made by the defendant after full consultation with counsel.\
  • counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to raise meritless claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.