Skip to main content
· 4/17/1975

Slater v. Rimar, Inc.

Citations

  • 338 A.2d 584
  • 462 Pa. 138
  • 1975 Pa. LEXIS 842

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a judge may disqualify an attorney appearing before him who is conflicted out of representing his client
  • explaining that a judge may disqualify an attorney appearing before him who is conflicted out of representing his client
  • denying access to all material when plaintiff brought suit based on confidential information learned from defendant's former counsel
  • denying access to all material when plaintiff brought suit based on confidential information learned from defendant’s former counsel
  • “[T]he law wisely declares that all confidential communications and disclosures, made by a client to his legal adviser for the purpose of obtaining his professional aid or advice, shall be strictly privileged[.]” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
  • where the plaintiff’s lawyer had been an officer and director, as well as corporate counsel, for the defendant companies and derived the entirety of the plaintiff’s complaint in a shareholder derivative action upon information he had gathered as the defendants' attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Eagen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.