Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 11/15/2016

Commonwealth v. Serrano

Citations

150 A.3d 470
2016 Pa. Super. 246
2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a substantial question was presented when that appellant asserted the lower court failed to consider his individualized needs
holding that a resentencing court should not mechanically reimpose the previous judgment of sentence without making an independent reevaluation of the Sentencing Code’s criteria
concluding that the presiding judge had abused its discretion by failing to independently evaluate the case
stating that a substantial question has been presented where an appellant alleged that the sentencing court failed to consider the defendant’s individualized circumstances and rehabilitative needs
stating that a substantial question has been presented where an appellant alleged that the sentencing court failed to consider the defendant’s individualized circumstances and rehabilitative needs
finding substantial question where appellant, claimed, trial court failed to consider his individualized needs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Lazarus, Jenkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.