Commonwealth v. Ahmad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court’s failure to consider a defendant’s individualized circumstances raises a substantial question
• recognizing that a claim that a sentence is excessive challenges discretionary aspects of the sentence
• explaining that “[a] challenge to an alleged excessive sentence is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of a sentence” (citation omitted)
• stating that “[a] challenge to an alleged excessive sentence is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of a sentence” (citation omitted)
• stating that “[a] challenge to an -2- J-S77033-14 alleged excessive sentence is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of a sentence.”
• explaining that “[a] challenge to an alleged excessive sentence is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of a sentence” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).