Commonwealth v. Mastromarino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that claim involving the imposition of consecutive sentences challenged the discretionary aspects of sentencing
• concluding that disparate sentence claim raised a substantial question
• reviewing in detail the particular facts of case in - 21 - J-S26018-22 considering whether appellant raised a substantial question in challenging consecutive imposition of 53 sentences, for aggregate term of 25 to 58 years’ imprisonment
• declining to find a substantial question based on excessive sentence claim
• “[A substantial question is presented when] the decision to sentence consecutively raises the aggregate sentence to, what appears upon its face to be, an excessive level in light of the criminal conduct at issue”
• finding substantial question raised by unexplained disparity between codefendants’ sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).