Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Rush

Citations

  • 162 A.3d 530
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 141
  • 2017 WL 1955302
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an assertion that the trial court also failed to consider, among other things, a defendant’s rehabilitative needs, and thereby imposed an unreasonable and excessive sentence, presents a substantial question
  • a claim that the trial court failed to consider the defendant’s individualized sentencing needs raises a substantial question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubow, Moulton, Musmanno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.