Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/27/2000
Commonwealth v. Sattazahn
Citations
- 763 A.2d 359
- 563 Pa. 533
- 2000 Pa. LEXIS 2815
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding trial court did not commit reversible error by limiting defense counsel’s impeachment of a witness where evidence was cumulative of other impeachment evidence and appellant failed to show prejudice
- setting forth the standard jury instruction that should follow the introduction of evidence of a prior inconsistent statement
- upholding the Martorano decision concerning jury deadlock and finding this decision did not have a chilling effect so as to constitute a de facto denial of defendant’s right to appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-29· cited 642×
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-30· cited 478×
- Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-08-17· cited 308×
- Commonwealth v. CharlestonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-06-06· cited 278×
- Commonwealth v. FlorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-07-22· cited 148×
- Commonwealth v. SattazahnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-07-24· cited 127×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-29· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. CharlestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-02-18· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. SchoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-02· cited 81×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-10-24· cited 77×
- State v. BennWashington Supreme Court· 2007-08-23· cited 37×
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-01-10· cited 22×
- People v. ForcumAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-11-07· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-09-24· cited 19×
- Gill v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-20· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. SattazahnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-02-18· cited 17×
- Bacon v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-06-13· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. SattazahnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-11-20· cited 2×
- Collins v. Commonwealth, Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-02-19· cited 2×
- State v. DeloneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-18
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1981-05-04· cited 875×
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court· 1973-05-21· cited 874×
- Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 589×
- Poland v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 338×
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-04-02· cited 143×
- Commonwealth v. SaranchakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-24· cited 120×
- Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-10· cited 111×
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-05· cited 105×
- Commonwealth v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-28· cited 96×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-07· cited 92×
- Commonwealth v. BirchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-23· cited 72×
- Mendez-Rosas v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court· 1997-01-06· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-27· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-20· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-08· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-11-17· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.