Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/18/2011

Commonwealth v. Charleston

Citations

16 A.3d 505
2011 Pa. Super. 32
2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 40

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming trial court's decision regarding admissibility of evidence even though trial court's reasoning was unpersuasive since this Court may affirm the decision of the trial court on any basis
failure to deliver Miranda warnings prior to interrogation did not invalidate incriminating statements made by the defendant after subsequent receipt of Miranda warnings and waiver thereof
“Generally, a defendant waives subsequent challenges to the propriety of the jury charge on appeal if he responds in the negative when the court asks whether additions or corrections to a jury charge are necessary.”
rejecting an argument that Seibert established binding precedent
rejecting an argument that Seibert established binding precedent
collecting cases and explaining Chacko

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Olson, Ott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.