Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/5/1993

Commonwealth v. Young

Citations

637 A.2d 1313
536 Pa. 57
1993 Pa. LEXIS 250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that analysis of the appellant’s federal ex post facto claim disposed of his state claim as well
holding that analysis of the appellant's federal ex post facto claim disposed of his state claim as well
holding that analysis of the appellant’s federal ex post facto claim disposed of his state claim as well
rejecting appellant's argument that retroactive application of § 9711(h) \deprived him of the right to have his death sentence automatically modified to life imprisonment and the right not to face the possibility of a death sentence\
rejecting appellant’s argument that retroactive application of § 9711(h) “deprived him of the right to have his death sentence automatically modified to life imprisonment and the right not to face the possibility of a death sentence”
rejecting appellant’s argument that retroactive application of Section 9711(h) “deprived him of the right to have his death sentence automatically modified to life imprisonment and the right not to face the possibility of a death sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.