Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 4/10/1985

Commonwealth v. Robinson

Citations

491 A.2d 107
507 Pa. 522
1985 Pa. LEXIS 381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

disallowing inquiry into a witness’ motive is highly prejudicial in cases which hinge on credibility
disallowing inquiry into a witness' motive is highly prejudicial in cases which hinge on credibility
“[A] witness may be cross-examined for the purpose of showing a motive to give false testimony.”
cross-examination may be employed to test witness’s story, impeach credibility, and establish motive for testifying
“Criminal defendants have a constitutional right to confront witnesses against them, which includes the right to cross-examine[.]”
where prosecution and defense witnesses presented conflicting versions of the facts, and credibility of the witnesses was therefore pivotal, the trial court committed reversible error by restricting cross-examination as to the bias of the prosecution’s chief witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.