Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Gentile

Citations

  • 640 A.2d 1309
  • 433 Pa. Super. 381
  • 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “breaches of official duty are included within the types of conduct described as ‘affirmative interference[s] with governmental functions.’”
  • stating that “cross-examination directed toward revealing possible bias, interest or motive of a witness in testifying against the defendant is -4- J-S25010-23 always relevant as discrediting the witness and affecting the weight of [her] testimony”
  • error in excluding evidence of bias was deemed harmless where witness’ testimony was confirmed by other -witnesses
  • error in excluding evidence of bias was deemed harmless where witness' testimony was confirmed by other witnesses
  • any error in disallowing cross-examination regarding the witness’ pending criminal charge and possible bias was deemed harmless when that witness’ testimony was confirmed by other witnesses at trial
  • any error in disallowing cross-examination regarding the witness' pending criminal charge and possible bias was deemed harmless when that witness' testimony was confirmed by other witnesses at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Hudock, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.